(05-05-2010 02:39 PM)HuskieFan84 Wrote: Klake.. my point was many other countries are failing and have failed throughout history. America is struggling right now too. His pointing at socialism as the cause of the problems, and not a terribly run government is ridiculous. Any form of government will fail when run poorly. I was pointing out there are plenty of successful socialist countries.
If you are going to make a pathetically simple argument that because one or two socialist countries are failing, socialism doesn't work, is no different than pointing out a capitalist country that failed and saying capitalism doesn't work. It's stupid. Kevin is not bright and his argument that Sweden & Norway are not good places to live or that Sweden has contributed nothing to Western civilization suggests as much. It's unfortunate, but it is what it is. He falls in the MaddDawgz group of NIU graduates, people we are ashamed of when discussing our university.
Socialism didn't fail, the leaders of Greece did. If it was socialism that was the problem, wouldn't all socialist countries have failed? You could point to China, a thriving communist country (edit, typo) and make the opposite argument that communism works for all. Of course that's ridiculous, but no more ridiculous than what Kevin has suggested.
Listen ass clown! The leaders of Greece for 24 out of the past 30 years have been socialists and their socialist policies have failed!
Next subject, here are some interesting facts about your paradise on earth Sweden. These figures come from the Center for Freedom and Prosperity, concepts that you do not believe in.
Taxes in Sweden consume more than 50 percent of GDP. The aggregate tax burden rose by about 150 percent between 1950 and 1980, but has since that time remained relatively stable.
The top marginal income tax rate is about 57 percent. While punitive, the top rate used to be nearly 90 percent in the late 1970s. While the long-term trend is positive, the short-term trend is unfavorable. The top tax rate had fallen to 51 percent immediately after the 1991 reform.
Payroll taxes are a significant burden, totaling nearly 40 percent of income, including a 32.28 percent tax imposed on employers. These taxes finance retirement, sick leave, unemployment, parental leave, and other programs.
Wealth is taxed. Assets are tax-exempt up to SEK 1,500,000 (US$ 205,863)3 per individual. With some variations, the standard tax rate above that level is 1.5 percent.
The value added tax is 25 percent, the maximum rate allowed for European Union nations, but there are preferential rates for several items.
The tax burden in the Swedish economy tripled between 1950 and 1980. In 1970, when taxes were not much higher than they are in America today, Sweden's GDP per capita ranked fifth in the world4. Since taxes passed 50 percent of GDP the country's overall prosperity has dwindled, and the downturn has been most dramatic in measures of the standard of living. In 1970 Sweden ranked third in OECD for individual consumption, 39 percent above OECD average. By 1995, Sweden barely beat the OECD average, ranking 14th with an individual consumption 1.4 percent above OECD average, and has been stagnant since that time.
Sweden is a slow-growth economy. After rising rapidly after World War II, economic performance stagnated once the burden of government reached high levels in the 1970s and 1980s. Since that time, inflation-adjusted growth has averaged less than 3 percent per year.
Unemployment is now a significant problem in Sweden. The official jobless rate is about 8 percent, but independent estimates show the rate is closer to 20 percent.
High taxes and excessive regulations have encouraged many large corporations to leave the country. Many individuals also are escaping the Swedish tax system, ranging from high-net worth entrepreneurs to new college graduates. This combination of capital flight and brain drain does not bode well for the future.
Even the Swedish tax authority tries to avoid Swedish taxes. As noted by the Wall Street Journal, "When it comes to paying taxes itself, the Swedish Tax Authority, responsible for collecting some of the highest in the world, would just as soon keep them as low as possible. It's saving a bundle on the production of slick TV spots that encourage Swedes to file online by producing them in the neighboring free-market, low-tax haven of Estonia. ...Spokesman Björn Tharnstrom told us, "We decided to do it in Tallinn because the costs are lower. One of those costs is taxes, of course."
Now, why don't you name some of those great technical innovations to come out of Sweden or a major contribution to western civilization? Name them!
Lastly, from my overall observations of your posts you seem to be a welfare recipient and if an alumni, a complete disgrace to NIU and a positive work ethnic. You should go to the University of Toledo board where you would fit right in drooling and coloring pictures with crayons.